On December 31, 2009, Psystar filed a Report of Compliance with Injunction (you can view the filing here). There are a few points of interest.

In paragraph 4, Pedraza makes a statement that seems to be contradictory to Psystar’s stated position in the Miami Court; that is, the California case does not involve Rebel EFI. How so? Pedraza states that Psystar has ceased selling Rebel EFI in order to comply with the California Injunction, but why do so if that Injunction didn’t apply to that product.

In paragraphs 5 and 6, the details of behind-the-scenes agreements between the parties is revealed. Psystar has agreed to destroy all but one copy of the current version of Rebel EFI and to save a copy of all prior versions. Apparently this agreement was made due to Apple’s concern that Psystar might construe the Injunction as requiring the destruction of all product.

In addition to her position as Assistant Editor at World of Apple, dizzle runs idrankthekoolaid, an Apple fangrl satire blog, and is an Administrator and Hostess at MyAppleSpace and their vidcast MASTv.