<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quad-Core 17-Inch MacBook Pro at Macworld?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.worldofapple.com/archives/2008/12/31/quad-core-17-inch-macbook-pro-at-macworld/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.worldofapple.com/archives/2008/12/31/quad-core-17-inch-macbook-pro-at-macworld/</link>
	<description>Mac News, Rumours and Opinions That You Want to Hear.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:22:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ¿Nuevo MacBook Pro de 17” con Quad-Core? : Blogografia</title>
		<link>http://news.worldofapple.com/archives/2008/12/31/quad-core-17-inch-macbook-pro-at-macworld/comment-page-1/#comment-32547</link>
		<dc:creator>¿Nuevo MacBook Pro de 17” con Quad-Core? : Blogografia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 13:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.worldofapple.com/?p=2759#comment-32547</guid>
		<description>[...] Apple prepping a quad-core MacBook Pro? &#124; Vía: Quad-Core 17-Inch MacBook Pro at Macworld? &#124; Foto: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Apple prepping a quad-core MacBook Pro? | Vía: Quad-Core 17-Inch MacBook Pro at Macworld? | Foto: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quad-Core 17-Inch MacBook Pro at Macworld? - Chad Michael Wright</title>
		<link>http://news.worldofapple.com/archives/2008/12/31/quad-core-17-inch-macbook-pro-at-macworld/comment-page-1/#comment-32540</link>
		<dc:creator>Quad-Core 17-Inch MacBook Pro at Macworld? - Chad Michael Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 21:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.worldofapple.com/?p=2759#comment-32540</guid>
		<description>[...] article is reprinted from this link and is posted here because I&#8217;m excitedly waiting for the new MBP 17 to be released and then [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] article is reprinted from this link and is posted here because I&#8217;m excitedly waiting for the new MBP 17 to be released and then [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregg</title>
		<link>http://news.worldofapple.com/archives/2008/12/31/quad-core-17-inch-macbook-pro-at-macworld/comment-page-1/#comment-32539</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 16:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.worldofapple.com/?p=2759#comment-32539</guid>
		<description>Probably won&#039;t happen next week, but remember that the 17inch MacBook Pro is generally used by professionals and not just your average consumer or the &#039;majority&#039;. I would suggest most digital creative professionals would grasp the benefits of a quad-core processor and understand that Ghz is not the sole measure of a machine&#039;s performance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably won&#8217;t happen next week, but remember that the 17inch MacBook Pro is generally used by professionals and not just your average consumer or the &#8216;majority&#8217;. I would suggest most digital creative professionals would grasp the benefits of a quad-core processor and understand that Ghz is not the sole measure of a machine&#8217;s performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Brooks</title>
		<link>http://news.worldofapple.com/archives/2008/12/31/quad-core-17-inch-macbook-pro-at-macworld/comment-page-1/#comment-32526</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Brooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 20:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.worldofapple.com/?p=2759#comment-32526</guid>
		<description>Scott,

I&#039;m inclined to believe your reasons for Apple not having this product ready yet.

Although it wouldn&#039;t be the first time that Apple had access to a processor ahead of its release.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m inclined to believe your reasons for Apple not having this product ready yet.</p>
<p>Although it wouldn&#8217;t be the first time that Apple had access to a processor ahead of its release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Falkner</title>
		<link>http://news.worldofapple.com/archives/2008/12/31/quad-core-17-inch-macbook-pro-at-macworld/comment-page-1/#comment-32525</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Falkner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 20:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.worldofapple.com/?p=2759#comment-32525</guid>
		<description>I doubt this for three reasons:

1. The chip is very new. Apple could not have had time to build and test a system around so new a chip. True, they sometimes announce new products that will ship later, but a 17&quot; Macbook Pro is not a new product. There is current demand for the 17&quot; upgrade, and announcing that we&#039;ll have to wait months for the system to be built and tested will not make people happy.

2. Quad core chips don&#039;t offer much overall performance improvement to programs not optimized to work with multiple cores. 3D rendering, some Photoshop, and video editing are the primary purposes for the chip, and most of those are done on Mac Pros. The four cores just won&#039;t give the average user any worthwhile improvement.

3. The chip&#039;s current maximum clock speed is 2 GHz. While many people know GHz alone is not a fair measure of a chip&#039;s performance, those people are not in the majority. When I go online to Apple to buy a laptop, I want a fast chip. The 2.4 GHz chip is a $1400 MacBook looks 20% faster than the 2 GHz chip is a MBP that costs twice as much. That&#039;s what people will see.

Expect the chip to start showing up in MBPs when Snow Leopard ships. Snow Leopard&#039;s improved support for multi-core processors will make this chip more useful across the board. Until then, it&#039;s in the lab.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt this for three reasons:</p>
<p>1. The chip is very new. Apple could not have had time to build and test a system around so new a chip. True, they sometimes announce new products that will ship later, but a 17&#8243; Macbook Pro is not a new product. There is current demand for the 17&#8243; upgrade, and announcing that we&#8217;ll have to wait months for the system to be built and tested will not make people happy.</p>
<p>2. Quad core chips don&#8217;t offer much overall performance improvement to programs not optimized to work with multiple cores. 3D rendering, some Photoshop, and video editing are the primary purposes for the chip, and most of those are done on Mac Pros. The four cores just won&#8217;t give the average user any worthwhile improvement.</p>
<p>3. The chip&#8217;s current maximum clock speed is 2 GHz. While many people know GHz alone is not a fair measure of a chip&#8217;s performance, those people are not in the majority. When I go online to Apple to buy a laptop, I want a fast chip. The 2.4 GHz chip is a $1400 MacBook looks 20% faster than the 2 GHz chip is a MBP that costs twice as much. That&#8217;s what people will see.</p>
<p>Expect the chip to start showing up in MBPs when Snow Leopard ships. Snow Leopard&#8217;s improved support for multi-core processors will make this chip more useful across the board. Until then, it&#8217;s in the lab.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mack</title>
		<link>http://news.worldofapple.com/archives/2008/12/31/quad-core-17-inch-macbook-pro-at-macworld/comment-page-1/#comment-32506</link>
		<dc:creator>Mack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.worldofapple.com/?p=2759#comment-32506</guid>
		<description>An option for 8GB of memory would be nice in both the 17 and 15 inch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An option for 8GB of memory would be nice in both the 17 and 15 inch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
