Misinformation on the Apple v. Psystar Case
- November 4th, 2008 - 10.47 am UTC
- Apple Legal News, Psystar
- dizzle
I have some sound advice to the Apple web. Please do not write on legal issues if you know absolutely nothing about legal issues. For instance, MacNN and AppleInsider claimed that the recent filings, such as the proposed Case Management Scheduling Report, indicate that ADR is likely to be unsuccessful. AppleInsider went so far as to state:
Last month, it was reported that Apple and Psystar had agreed to pursue a mediated settlement to their legal dispute, a move which now seemingly been aborted.
This is, bluntly, false. Folks, please, this is very basic legal procedure. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are available online. I specifically direct the reader to Rules 16 and 26. The filing of a Case Management Scheduling Report is required by the Rules. Absolutely nothing should be read into this except the fact that the respective attorneys are properly following the Rules. That’s it.
corrected one grammar mistake since initial posting
Comments
No comments yet
Add Your Comment