Psystar Incorporates Blu-Ray, So What?
- October 30th, 2008 - 11.32 am UTC
- News of Interest, Psystar
- dizzle
Editors note: This article contains the opinions of the author
The blogs are a-buzz with the news that Psystar has incorporated Blu-Ray players into their OpenComputer line. Is this a big deal? Yes and no. Bottomline? Yawn.
First, commenters on various articles, such as one I wrote a few days ago, speak in somewhat misleading terms, though unintentionally so. The claim is made that Psystar has “integrated” Blu-Ray drives, or alternatively the claim is that the new model is Blu-Ray compatible. When we get down to brass tacks, this hinges on what is meant by “integrated” and “compatible.”
Integrated
Integrated into what? The actual hardware? Okay, yes, Psystar has produced a tower that has a Blu-Ray drive contained within it, but I would bet my biscuits that the Hackintosh community has already done this months ago. This frankly is not a huge deal. Why? It is not integrated where it counts: in the operating system itself. OS X does not support Blu-Ray. So while consumers may be able to use a product such as Toast 9 Titanium (please see my prior review here at World of Apple), to create Blu-Ray disks; they won’t be able to watch them on their Psystar computer. Doh!
Compatible
The question once again must be asked: compatible with what? It certainly isn’t compatible for playing Blu-Ray content on the operating system.
The Facts
Precisely two weeks ago, The Mac Observer announced that a Blu-Ray burner that can perform any task that the low-end Psystar can was already available from AMEX. It is not “integrated” into the tower but with its very attractive design and low profile, I doubt that matters much, particularly when Apple has the power to make whatever “integrated” players in Psystar machines difficult to operate if and when they offer Blu-Ray support. If Psystar wants to play hard-ball with Apple, the smart money is on Apple. Further, the fact that the AMEX player is not “integrated” means that not only can it be used with a user’s desktop system but also their laptop (including the MacBook Air). There is a reason that Apple has not yet put Blu-Ray drives into its machines, and I don’t know precisely why, but I am going to go out on a limb and venture a guess that Apple might know a teensy-weensy bit more than a couple of punks in Miami about why such a move is not yet ideal for their products. But hey, that’s just me.
So basically this is a tactical psychological move by Psystar that means very little to the market. Gullible people might be persuaded to purchase this system believing that it will do something that it cannot without realizing that they will need to have, at a minimum, $100.00 of additional software that still won’t even allow them to watch the content on their computer. Psystar is at the mercy of Apple for the operating system support, unless they intend upon modifying OS X code which might not be the most intelligent move for them to make. My personal opinion is that posturing that seems to be intentionally obnoxious and provocative are not particularly well-received by the courts when done during a pending case, so one part of me is pleased to see Psystar behave this way. Consumers may chuckle, but courts look at whether or not the parties are acting in good-faith to resolve their disputes. Obviously, I cannot know how this will be perceived by the Court in question, but I believe that Psystar is making a childish mistake and making unnecessary enemies. I am not only speaking of Apple but also many within the Apple community who might be potential future consumers but could be provoked to go out their way to attack the product. The Windows v. Macintosh wars are already legendary and the zeal with which Apple fans defend their beloved company goes above and beyond that of nearly any other company. Whether this defense is rational or not, a few trash-talking points is not worth waking that sleeping giant. Speaking as one unabashedly open Apple fangirl, they have earned my loathing, and I have not hidden that fact. Despite that, I believe when it comes to facts, rather than my own editorial opinion, I have been as accurate and unbiased as possible.
In short, this is about as exciting as Psystar announcing that it added a floppy drive. It is a barnyard cock-strutting move that at best does little to nothing to help consumers and at worst harms them by what is not obvious. Oops.
Comments
Tom 31st October 2008, 02.27 am
Great post. You nailed it. Psystar slapped in a Blu-Ray drive which is nothing special, but it looks good in a press release.
Sadly, it served its purpose, given all the press it’s getting.
dizzle 31st October 2008, 02.48 am
God bless you Tom. I wasn’t even going to write on this at all, but I was reading my RSS feed one morning and nearly lost my breakfast on my keyboard. So like when so many blogs were reporting that Apple and Psystar agreed to definitely settle out of Court, which was just blatantly untrue, I had to say something.
Jay 31st October 2008, 08.47 am
Good post indeed. Let’s see what Apple make of this.
dizzle 31st October 2008, 10.50 am
I certainly think it will have its goal of irritating Apple. I just don’t think that is a smart move for Psystar at this time, strategically speaking. Psystar does not have an intensely loyal fan base to draw from. They have a few people with various interests, the largest block being those who just don’t like Apple. That is not a customer base that is loyal, they will flock to the next company as soon as the wind blows. IOW, they may be getting some satisfaction in the short-term, but we know that Apple is patient. Look how long Jobs took to get even with Gates?
But even beyond that, I just know from my experience with the court system, especially the Federal Courts, judges just do not like purposefully goading posturing by any party. If Apple put out an ad right now (they wouldn’t, but lets pretend) slamming Psystar, I believe the Court would look upon that with disfavour. Federal Court cases are pretty fast-tracked as court cases go. If Psystar believes they have a legitimate case, the way to indicate that to the court is to be able to point to how they have been good little boys until the case finishes. From what I have read of the pleadings filed by their attorneys, I cannot imagine that their legal counsel is pleased with these actions.
Now none of that is speaking as an Apple fangirl, which I am. Those are objective facts. I try to be pretty clear when I am putting the fangirl hat on. The fangirl in me is happy that they are acting like the business end of a horse. And I am sure Apple’s attorneys are going to capitalize on this.
With the first round of pleadings, I thought that tactically speaking, just on grounds of cleverness (as I don’t pretend to know hardly anything about anti-trust law and am not an attorney), the two sides came out in a dead heat. In the second round, I think Apple saw a critical mistake that Psystar made in its last pleading (a flaw which I pointed out here BTW–no I am not claiming Apple got it from me, just saying that I obviously am on the same wavelength as their legal team) and came out ahead.
I am dreading 11/6/08, the date of the Motion to Dismiss hearing. Not because I think it will be devastating for Apple to lose that Motion, but because the blogs will once again be filled with misinformation over the significance of that loss. Let me say it first here. If Apple wins that Motion I will faint. Why? Courts DO NOT LIKE TAKING THINGS OUT OF THE HANDS OF THE JURY and will find any shred of doubt to favour the non-moving party. Even if it were reversed and it was Psystar filing the Motion, 99.9% chance they would loose. In my 12 years as a legal assistant I could count on one hand that cases I worked on have won on a Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice.
So please everyone on other blogs, please read this and settle down now. Apple will almost certainly loose their Motion to Dismiss. I know it, they know it. Psystar’s attorneys are high-powered professionals and know how to craft a counterclaim so that it could not shot down so easily.
Maybe a little information on how this works might help the readers. Judges decide issues of law, juries decide issues of fact. Judges will only dismiss cases or take them out of the hands of the jury when they believe there are no legitimate issues of fact upon which the law can be applied. That is a bit of a simplification that an attorney would have to expand upon, but I hope the idea is put out there. Apple could be 100% correct on the law, but all Psystar had to do is get in one issue of fact that could arguably be a jury question, and they win. Do you see how easy that is? Great. When the poop hits the fan when Apple looses that motion, remember this post.
MrEd 31st October 2008, 13.52 pm
Apple will loose & so what. It’s just a PC clone now.
dizzle 31st October 2008, 15.02 pm
How can a PC be a PC clone? All PC means is personal computer. Now if you mean a Wintell clone, it seems to me that would require Windows. Do you have something to say that, oh, makes sense?
Also, care to articulate what your reasons are in a logical and coherent manner? Lose what? The Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice? I agree, and I articulated why instead of elephant-hurling. Lose the case? Why precisely do you think that? Have you read the pleadings? I am just pretty tired of people talking out of the hindquarters on this issue. Please show me that you have some rational basis and knowledge for your comment, otherwise it is just a troll.
chano 31st October 2008, 18.45 pm
When Apple puts PA Semi and Mr. Papermaster to work, the iPhone/Touch platform will benefit form proprietary add-ons but most interesting the add-ons the chip count on Macs will effectively give PsyStar and any other wannabe encroachers their walking papers.
You heard it here first.
dizzle 31st October 2008, 20.14 pm
I agree chano. It is just that the news around this whole Psystar thing has been so sensationalistic and misleading at times. Yes it is totally true that Psystar put in a Blu-Ray drive. But I could add a Blu-Ray drive to my Mac Pro. It is useless unless Apple supports it, so rather than Psystar beating Apple to the proverbial punch, they have basically conned some of the media and some of their consumers into believing that have offered some novel benefit. They haven’t. As far as OS X is concerned, the word of Jobs goes, and it is a “bag of hurt.” The fact is that even if Psystar won this case, they would still be at the mercy of Apple. When you sell someone else’s work you become their bondservant, and that isn’t a pleasant place to be. And seriously, does anyone think that Psystar will be able to compete if they did win the case against the Dells and HPs of the world that would produce clones? This is a short-term thing for Psystar no matter what unless my prior, completely out of my fantasy mind, theory is true–that they are getting paid a pretty penny to be patsies.
The uber-geeks really care about the proprietary issues. The semi-geeks (such as myself) and average Joes don’t care, in fact, they welcome it. I enjoy the walled garden, personally. But I understand it isn’t for everyone, and there are people, believe it or not that I recommend do not get a Mac. Very few, but there are some.
For some reason Psystar just brings out the irrational and addle-mindedness in some of the reporting out there.
MrEd 1st November 2008, 10.39 am
The mac’s are just PC clones – without any effort you can install OS X on a PC. Even if Psystar loose it is still only a PC clone now. PC’s for people who can’t install drivers without a support call.
dizzle 1st November 2008, 16.46 pm
I see you are just repeating yourself. I refer the reader to my response of 10/31/08 logged at 15.02pm.
I have a Windows machine right here (an HP laptop that I actually like). I inserted a Leopard disk. Whoops won’t install. I guess some effort is required. Do you have that problem with exaggeration much?