<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How &#8220;Server Grade&#8221; Is Time Capsules Drive? [Update - 500GB Details]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.worldofapple.com/archives/2008/03/01/how-server-grade-is-time-capsules-drive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.worldofapple.com/archives/2008/03/01/how-server-grade-is-time-capsules-drive/</link>
	<description>Mac News, Rumours and Opinions That You Want to Hear.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun,  7 Sep 2008 20:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mack</title>
		<link>http://news.worldofapple.com/archives/2008/03/01/how-server-grade-is-time-capsules-drive/#comment-24354</link>
		<dc:creator>Mack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 10:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.worldofapple.com/archives/2008/03/01/how-server-grade-is-time-capsules-drive/#comment-24354</guid>
		<description>I'd much prefer a time capsule with RAID rather than reliance on a single drive - no matter how "server grade" it is.

Having a single drive represents an unfortunate single point of failure that runs contrary to the whole time machine concept.

I hope that in the future Apple will offer a "time raider" variant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d much prefer a time capsule with RAID rather than reliance on a single drive - no matter how &#8220;server grade&#8221; it is.</p>
<p>Having a single drive represents an unfortunate single point of failure that runs contrary to the whole time machine concept.</p>
<p>I hope that in the future Apple will offer a &#8220;time raider&#8221; variant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple Clarifies Time Capsule Situation &#124; World of Apple</title>
		<link>http://news.worldofapple.com/archives/2008/03/01/how-server-grade-is-time-capsules-drive/#comment-24343</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple Clarifies Time Capsule Situation &#124; World of Apple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 10:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.worldofapple.com/archives/2008/03/01/how-server-grade-is-time-capsules-drive/#comment-24343</guid>
		<description>[...] yesterdays article on whether or not the drive used in the Time Capsule is server grade, comes a comment direct from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] yesterdays article on whether or not the drive used in the Time Capsule is server grade, comes a comment direct from [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fotos de un Time Capsule desmontado : planetamac</title>
		<link>http://news.worldofapple.com/archives/2008/03/01/how-server-grade-is-time-capsules-drive/#comment-24339</link>
		<dc:creator>Fotos de un Time Capsule desmontado : planetamac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 00:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.worldofapple.com/archives/2008/03/01/how-server-grade-is-time-capsules-drive/#comment-24339</guid>
		<description>[...] En World of Apple se hacen eco de la situación y concluyen que lo habitual de un disco duro de servidor es que tenga [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] En World of Apple se hacen eco de la situación y concluyen que lo habitual de un disco duro de servidor es que tenga [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debate: los discos duros de Time Capsule no son para servidores : Canal Apple</title>
		<link>http://news.worldofapple.com/archives/2008/03/01/how-server-grade-is-time-capsules-drive/#comment-24338</link>
		<dc:creator>Debate: los discos duros de Time Capsule no son para servidores : Canal Apple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 00:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.worldofapple.com/archives/2008/03/01/how-server-grade-is-time-capsules-drive/#comment-24338</guid>
		<description>[...] por un disco de este tipo en Time Capsule, pero al final optó por la unidad más barata de Hitachi. La ironía del asunto es que la unidad de 500 GB, la más pequeña, es para servidores: el Seagate Barracuda [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] por un disco de este tipo en Time Capsule, pero al final optó por la unidad más barata de Hitachi. La ironía del asunto es que la unidad de 500 GB, la más pequeña, es para servidores: el Seagate Barracuda [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fireball7</title>
		<link>http://news.worldofapple.com/archives/2008/03/01/how-server-grade-is-time-capsules-drive/#comment-24326</link>
		<dc:creator>fireball7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 21:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.worldofapple.com/archives/2008/03/01/how-server-grade-is-time-capsules-drive/#comment-24326</guid>
		<description>I can say one thing, I'd never put a deathstar labled drive in my server.  Infact I'd prefer not having it in any of my other computers either.  I guess its all about first impressions ain't it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can say one thing, I&#8217;d never put a deathstar labled drive in my server.  Infact I&#8217;d prefer not having it in any of my other computers either.  I guess its all about first impressions ain&#8217;t it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
