<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Future Mobile Mac Product Line?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.worldofapple.com/archives/2007/02/21/future-mobile-mac-product-line/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.worldofapple.com/archives/2007/02/21/future-mobile-mac-product-line/</link>
	<description>Mac News, Rumours and Opinions That You Want to Hear.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed,  7 Jan 2009 23:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: blackestcoat</title>
		<link>http://news.worldofapple.com/archives/2007/02/21/future-mobile-mac-product-line/#comment-19466</link>
		<dc:creator>blackestcoat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 00:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.worldofapple.com/archives/2007/02/21/future-mobile-mac-product-line/#comment-19466</guid>
		<description>See, as a former Apple employee, this is really puzzling to me, because when I was there (up until right before the Intel launch) Apple always made such a big deal to employees that the iBook/PowerBook are PORTABLE, not laptops or whatever.  To my knowledge that nomenclature hasn't changed with the new Intel line--if it hasn't, then this would seem to point to a new line of...something!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See, as a former Apple employee, this is really puzzling to me, because when I was there (up until right before the Intel launch) Apple always made such a big deal to employees that the iBook/PowerBook are PORTABLE, not laptops or whatever.  To my knowledge that nomenclature hasn&#8217;t changed with the new Intel line&#8211;if it hasn&#8217;t, then this would seem to point to a new line of&#8230;something!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
